CSE's 2020-2021 Annual Report was released on 28 June 2021, and
although I discussed the document on Twitter then, it's about time I got
around to commenting on it on this blog as well.
Improvement over 2019-2020 report
CSE's 2020-2021 report is considerably more informative than its
2019-2020 report, which was the agency's first attempt at responding to the CSE Act's
requirement to produce one. The new report contains about two and a half times as much text as the first one, and while that may be no guarantee of more signal among the noise, in this case it's fair to say that there has actually been some improvement.
As before, however, most of the information provided relates to CSE's cyber
security efforts, which account for only about 30% of the agency's resources.
The remaining 70% of CSE's resources go to CSE's signals intelligence (SIGINT)
side, about which the agency prefers to say as little as possible. Even less is said about CSE's new cyber operations mandate.
SIGINT and cyber operations
It's inevitable that much
about intelligence-gathering and covert-action kinds of activities must remain secret, but the paucity of information here is
still disappointing.
CSE's cyber operations mandate was granted only in 2019, and how
those powers are used will form a key part of Canada's contribution to determining the future of
cyberspace. We already knew that some number of such operations had been authorized; the only new thing we learn in this report is that some have actually been conducted. (More recently, CSE has acknowledged that cyber criminal activity was one of the targets of those cyber operations.)
By contrast, partner agencies such as NSA, GCHQ and
Australia's ASD have given specific examples of the operations they undertake,
and some of those governments engage in detailed public discussions of appropriate
strategies, laws, and norms for cyberspace.
Information
on CSE's SIGINT activities is also pretty scant.
Last year, the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA) decided against publishing a number of statistics about CSE's SIGINT program that formerly had been published by OCSEC, CSE's previous review agency. Since the publication of those statistics had in all cases been approved by CSE, it is evident that no security grounds would prevent their publication by CSE itself. Surely, therefore, CSE's report contains that information at least.
I jest of course.
Read more »