Honour among data thieves II
The "common understanding" that exists among the Five Eyes countries that they won't spy on each other seems to be less and less commonly held:
"Obama: No country where we have no-spy agreement," Associated Press, 11 February 2014.
See Honour among data thieves, UKUSA version for a look at how the "understanding", which does seem to exist, probably works in practice.
Update 2 May 2014:
U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice also asserts (says the New York Times) that "the United States [does] not have no-spy agreements with any of its close allies, even with the other members of the so-called Five Eyes — the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand" (David Sanger, "U.S. and Germany Fail to Reach a Deal on Spying," New York Times, 1 May 2014).
"Obama: No country where we have no-spy agreement," Associated Press, 11 February 2014.
See Honour among data thieves, UKUSA version for a look at how the "understanding", which does seem to exist, probably works in practice.
Update 2 May 2014:
U.S. National Security Advisor Susan Rice also asserts (says the New York Times) that "the United States [does] not have no-spy agreements with any of its close allies, even with the other members of the so-called Five Eyes — the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand" (David Sanger, "U.S. and Germany Fail to Reach a Deal on Spying," New York Times, 1 May 2014).
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home